I’m sitting in what is fast becoming my least favorite class of the quarter, Introduction to Archaeology, when my Professor decides he isn’t going to show up that day. So what do the dutiful TA’s do? They put in an educational movie. What else?
My friend diligently starts typing notes on the off chance that my professor puts a random movie factoid on the midterm (which he does eventually), and I open my computer and start Internet surfing!
However, after about five minutes of seeing “Inbox: 0”, “Messages: 0”, “Notifications: -1”, I give up and reluctantly start taking notes.
And this is what I ended up with (no joke…I copied/pasted this directly from my notes):
Movie Day: Plunder
- Guys in some southern country are grave diggers
Just throwing rocks every which way
Smuggle stuff to someplace (very risky)
BUT (could it be?) most of museum artifacts might be smuggled in from their country of origin
- Have auctions for fancy/old art
Origins of such pieces are very suspicious
Higher prices encourage more plundering (b/c there’s lots of profit to be made)
“Field” Archaeologists: a euphemism for THEIF!?!!??! …who knows
- Villagers in Peru started looking through dirt to find stuff left over from ancestors
Some villagers had ulterior motives, and sold artifacts on black market
Authorities shooed them away with guns
- Guy with beard: worked with Sweatnam guys smuggling goods
Guy with beard turns on them! And records their telephone calls
FBI busted into Sweatnam house
Sweatnam said, “We were only harmless art traders. This felt like a drug deal”
- Still not so good relations between Peru and US (no…really?!?!?!)
BTW- it’s a crime to smuggle artifacts
Sweatnam guys get the stuff back (???)
And local Peruvian police still can’t do much to stop plundering
You can tell I was really paying attention that day.
Except it wasn’t just that day. I haven’t bothered to tune into that class since Day 1 when all my Professor had to talk about was the class syllabus. And who could blame me? I’ve spent every lecture going over the techniques of “flint-napping” (aka: rock chipping), the importance of clay vs. ceramics (because, apparently, there’s a difference), and perfecting the art of digging. In the end, you have an old guy with a beard and a toothbrush on his hands and knees in the dirt. And what are we learning from all of this backbreaking work in the field? A few theories? Maybe a hypothesis here or there about how life might have been? It’s all speculation! You find a couple of acorns that look like they’ve been gnawed on and it’s automatically assumed that early humans’ primary diet was a few nuts.
And no offense to all of those Archaeology majors out there (who, by now, are shaking their heads at my ignorance of the trade), but I just don’t see the point. Don’t get me wrong…I understand why we should remember our past. And I see how it could be interesting to study human evolution. But is it really necessary to force students to memorize the differences between the Cultural Historic Period and the Explanatory Period of Archaeological thought? Um, no. Not really.
So for all you die-hard Indian Jones fans who just had their happiness crushed by an Introductory Archaeology class, I suggest finding a new elective for the rest of the quarter. That, or BS you’re way through the assignments and watch “Raiders of the Lost Ark” all night long!